Yield Spread Premiums -- FHA & Conventional Mortgages -- Why the uproar?
Politicians are wanting to step in and squash the yield spread premium (YSP) that is paid to brokers by offering higher rates. I am not here to debate politics
and what is right and wrong, but to give the true understanding what YSP is used for and how it can help the borrower when purchasing or refinancing a home.
Yield Spread Premium known as YSP is defined by wikipedia as the cash rebate paid to a mortgage broker based on selling an interest rate above the wholesale par rate that the borrower qualifies for.
It becomes a balancing act when a loan officer has to defend the reasoning behind how they make money, when the consumer can assume that the loan officer makes more money if they see the YSP on the good faith estimate or on the HUD settlement sheet. It becomes worse when that consumer now shops for his or her mortgage by trying to compare YSP's. This method in my opinion is ludicrous and just plain retarded. By disclosing the YSP just confuses the mortgage process.
Question : Would you select a doctor or a criminal lawyer by what they charge? How does the disclosure of the loan officer's profits affect the price that the consumer would pay for that loan? Very simple, by knowing the profit, the consumer is able to negotiate better.
What's been the hottest topic of lately? That it's unfair that the broker has to disclose the YSP. What gets me is that you just don't see it on the bankers side. Which could lead you to believe that mortgage bankers are cheaper. A lot of the hype is that many brokers don't disclose YSP on their inital good faith estimate, even though they have to by law. And then it's later seen on the closing settlement statement. This is where the client becomes angry and figures that the loan officer is trying to get over on them. What would solve the problem? Just allow the broker not to disclose the YSP. But congress wants to eliminate the YSP on the brokers side. This could make it more expensive for the borrower.
Let's take a peak, comparing 2 different lenders, not making a difference if it's a banker or a broker. Example : LENDER A : If their rate was 5.75% and they were charging 1 pt with $500 in fees. The YSP was 1 pt on the back. LENDER B : Their rate is 5.625% and were charging 1 pt with $500 in fees. But the YSP was 1 1/2 pts on the back. Who has the better deal? LENDER B has the best deal for the client. So what if they made more money. Unless we put an exact fee per loan to be made there is no transparency. I truly feel that if you get the loan officer to reduce their fees tremendously, that it would seriously affect your service that you would receive.
Conclusion : Katie Marchione said in a comment in another post, "When you buy a $50 shirt at Macy's, don't you think that there is profit
built into that price? You are paying for a product or for a service and
the providers deserve to get paid for it."
I admit, that there are loan officers that take advantage of the consumer. But there are many borrowers out there that don't have the money for all of the closing costs. And the lender can use the YSP to also pay for certain fees. And if the yield spread premium is taken away from the broker, borrowers will end up paying for more in closing costs because the lender needs to make a profit.




